Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

ON

OLD NATIONAL BANCORP /IN/ (ONB)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Adjusted EPS of $0.53 beat S&P consensus by ~$0.01 (2.3%), while GAAP EPS was $0.34 given Day 1 CECL, merger charges, and a pension gain; S&P “revenue” missed by ~14% due to the CECL provision flowing through vendor methodology . Q2 “Primary EPS” actual 0.53 vs 0.518 consensus; “Revenue” actual $534.7M vs $624.3M consensus (S&P Global)*.
  • Operating momentum was strong: NIM (FTE) expanded 26 bps to 3.53%, total revenue (FTE) rose to $654.4M, fee income strengthened, and deposits/loans expanded with Bremer; efficiency improved on an adjusted basis .
  • Guidance: management raised 2025 NII and fee income guidance; expects 4–6% full‑year organic loan growth ex‑Bremer (lower end), and reiterated a neutral rate stance with two 25 bp cuts in the base case .
  • Catalysts: (1) sustained NIM expansion and deposit cost discipline, (2) Bremer integration/on-time October system conversion, (3) potential capital return discussion post-conversion (buybacks “on the horizon”), and (4) credit normalization staying benign vs peers .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

  • What Went Well

    • Margin/earning asset growth: NIM (FTE) rose to 3.53% (+26 bps q/q) on Bremer, organic loan growth, and securities repositioning; NII (FTE) reached $521.9M . “We expect NII and NIM will continue to grow in the second half of 2025” (CFO) .
    • Fee momentum: Noninterest income was $132.5M ($111.6M ex pension gain), with strength in wealth, mortgage, and capital markets; adjusted PPNR improved to $289.9M .
    • Deposit franchise: Deposits rose to $54.4B (core +$11.6B including Bremer); total deposit costs held at 1.93% (+2 bps); loan/deposit ratio improved to 88% .
    • Quote: “Old National’s impressive second quarter results were achieved through… Growing our balance sheet, expanding our fee-based businesses, and controlling expenses.” – CEO Jim Ryan .
  • What Went Wrong

    • Reported “revenue” miss vs S&P: Vendor “revenue” fell short (CECL Day 1 $75.6M reduces S&P’s revenue construct), yielding a headline miss despite strong FTE revenue and PPNR growth (S&P values)*.
    • Elevated provision and integration costs: Provision rose to $106.8M (incl. $75.6M CECL Day 1); merger-related charges were $41.2M, partially offset by a $21.0M pension gain .
    • Competitive loan market: Management’s organic loan growth bias to the lower end of 4–6% reflects heightened CRE competition and disciplined pricing/structure .

Financial Results

Headline trend vs prior quarters

MetricQ4 2024Q1 2025Q2 2025
EPS (GAAP, $)0.47 0.44 0.34
Adjusted EPS ($)0.49 0.45 0.53
Net Interest Income (GAAP, $mm)394.18 387.64 514.79
Noninterest Income ($mm)95.77 93.79 132.52
Provision for Credit Losses ($mm)27.02 31.40 106.84
NIM (FTE, %)3.30 3.27 3.53
Efficiency Ratio (%)54.4 53.7 55.8

Estimate comparison (S&P Global)

Metric (Q2 2025)S&P ConsensusActualSurprise
Primary EPS (Adjusted)$0.518*$0.53*+$0.012 (+2.3%)*
Revenue$624.28M*$534.66M*-$89.62M (-14.4%)*

Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Note: ONB’s reported total revenue (FTE) was $654.37M (NII FTE $521.85M + noninterest income $132.52M); S&P’s “revenue” methodology for banks aligns more closely with “net interest income after provision + noninterest income,” which was ~$540.47M in Q2, explaining the apparent miss given the $75.6M Day 1 CECL impact .

Year-over-year snapshot

MetricQ2 2024Q2 2025
EPS (GAAP, $)0.37 0.34
Adjusted EPS ($)0.46 0.53
NIM (FTE, %)3.33 3.53
EOP Deposits ($B)40.00 54.36
EOP Loans ($B)36.15 47.90
NCOs / Avg Loans (%)0.16 0.24
ACL / EOP Loans (%)1.08 1.24
CET1 (%)10.73 10.74

KPIs and balance sheet quality

KPIQ4 2024Q1 2025Q2 2025
EOP Loans ($B)36.29 36.41 47.90
EOP Deposits ($B)40.82 41.03 54.36
Loan/Deposit Ratio (%)89 89 88
NCOs / Avg Loans (%)0.21 0.24 0.24
ACL / EOP Loans (%)1.14 1.16 1.24
CET1 (%)11.38 11.62 10.74
TCE / TA (%)7.41 7.76 7.26

Notes:

  • Notable items in Q2: $75.6M Day 1 CECL (non‑PCD), $41.2M merger charges, $21.0M pension gain .
  • Adjusted PPNR improved to $289.9M; adjusted efficiency to 50.2% .

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
Net Interest Income (NII)FY 2025Prior framework (not quantified publicly)Increased; NII expected to grow in H2 2025Raised
Fee IncomeFY 2025Prior frameworkIncreased; mortgage, wealth, capital markets tracking wellRaised
Organic Loan Growth (ex‑Bremer)FY 20254–6%4–6%, likely lower end given competition and active portfolio managementRange maintained; lower-end bias
Non‑interest‑bearing MixFY 2025StableExpected to remain relatively stableMaintained
Rate AssumptionsH2 2025N/ATwo 25 bp cuts; 5‑yr UST stabilizes at 4%; down‑rate deposit beta ~40%Provided
Rate SensitivityH2 2025N/AGuidance unchanged for one or no cuts; balance sheet neutrally positionedMaintained
Bremer Conversion2025N/AOn track for mid‑October systems conversionReaffirmed
DividendQ3 2025$0.14/sh$0.14/sh declared (payable Sep 15)Maintained

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q-2 and Q-1)Current Period (Q2 2025)Trend
AI/TechnologyLimited explicit commentary in prior PRsNew CIO (Matt Keen) in place; focus on data, treasury mgmt, ecosystem; “looking at AI very intensely” Increasing focus/investment
Supply chain / Tariffs / MacroNot a major factor in prior PRsClients “cautiously optimistic”; tariffs/trade effects less than feared; inventory normalization Improving sentiment
RegulatoryNot highlighted previously“Very constructive” deregulatory tone; awaiting clarity on thresholds Improving backdrop
Product performance (Fees)Q1 seasonally softer fees Wealth, mortgage, capital markets stronger; fee guide raised Improving
CreditStable/benign in Q4/Q1 NCOs 24 bps; criticized/classified down 9% ex‑Bremer; ACL up 8 bps to 1.24% Stable/slightly better mix
Capital deploymentBuild capital in Q1Buybacks “on the horizon,” post-conversion; CET1 ~50 bps better than modeled Optionality rising

Management Commentary

  • CEO: “Old National’s impressive second quarter results were achieved through… Growing our balance sheet, expanding our fee-based businesses, and controlling expenses… with the successful closing of our partnership with Bremer on May 1, 2025.”
  • CFO: “Adjusted EPS were $0.53… Results were driven by additional two months of Bremer, organic growth in loans and deposits, margin expansion, growth in fee income, and well-controlled expenses.”
  • CFO on NIM/NII trajectory: “Repricing dynamics… combined with loan growth and the Bremer partnership, support our expectation that NII and NIM will continue to grow in the second half of 2025.”
  • CEO on capital return: “We are interested in building a little bit of capital… buyback is on the horizon… focusing on conversion and a strong start for next year.”

Q&A Highlights

  • Loan growth outlook: Heightened CRE competition; disciplined pricing/structure leads to lower‑end 4–6% organic growth bias; strong C&I pipeline .
  • Deposit costs and mix: Spot total deposit cost 1.93%; noninterest-bearing ~25% of core (up ~2 pts q/q); brokered ~6% of deposits—below peers .
  • Time deposit/brokered repricing: ~$5.5B TDs roll in Q3, ~$3B in Q4; ~$2.4B brokered next 90 days at mid‑4s offers downward repricing opportunity .
  • Capital and buybacks: CET1 ~50 bps better than expected post‑Bremer; evaluating buybacks post‑conversion .
  • Deal model EPS: 2026 EPS tracking at “$2.60+” with retained $2.4B CRE offsetting lower rate/credit marks .

Estimates Context

  • Q2 2025 vs S&P consensus: Adjusted/Primary EPS $0.53 vs $0.518 (+$0.012); “Revenue” $534.7M vs $624.3M (‑$89.6M). The revenue miss is driven by S&P’s bank revenue methodology that effectively includes provision (Day 1 CECL $75.6M), while ONB’s reported FTE total revenue was $654.4M . Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
  • Forward consensus: S&P Primary EPS means trend up ($0.59 in Q3 2025E; $0.645 by Q2 2026E); revenue means ~$706–723M by Q4 2025–Q2 2026E as the larger balance sheet rolls forward (S&P Global).*
    Values retrieved from S&P Global.

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Core earnings power is improving: NIM expansion, higher FTE revenue, and growing fee lines underpin H2 tailwinds despite CECL/merger noise .
  • Deposit franchise remains an asset: low cost, stable NIB mix, and room to reprice brokered TDs lower should support margin resilience .
  • Guidance skew is positive on NII/fees; loan growth prudently biased to the lower end amid CRE competition—expect C&I-led production with active portfolio management .
  • Credit is normalizing but contained vs peers; criticized/classified reductions and adequate reserves (ACL 1.24% of loans) reduce downside risk .
  • Bremer integration ahead of schedule with October conversion on track; securities repositioning already lifted portfolio yield and reduced duration/RWA density .
  • Capital optionality improving; buybacks under consideration post-conversion could add to TSR if credit/margin trends hold .
  • Near-term trading setup: Adjusted EPS beat and raised NII/fee guide are supportive, but headline “revenue” miss (vendor methodology) and elevated one-time CECL could create noise; focus on H2 NIM trajectory, deposit costs, and any color on buyback timing .

Footnotes:

  • Values retrieved from S&P Global.